Research correspondence
A wrong outcome or a misplaced population would change the argument. Those are the corrections that matter here.
Contact availability
NAD Plus Energy currently has no public correspondence inbox. There is no submission form on this page, and no message can be delivered through it.
A correction I would take seriously could be as small as an omitted qualifier: an outcome attributed to the wrong group, a mouse result carried into a human sentence, or a positive comparison described more strongly than the paper supports. The study title and the exact passage would make the issue clear.
The reading list gives the sources discussed here. Questions about an individual's fatigue, symptoms or treatment require medical care beyond the scope of this site. The about page explains the editorial purpose.